rose bowl

I would like the league's opinion on this, especially Purdue. Im posting this before our game so that if i lose you cant say im winning about it. I was wondering if we could change the rose bowl setting, winners of the pac-12 and big10. I dont care if one winner goes there every year or if its two open spots, but I dont know how anyone else would like playing the same person in the same bowl game every year. I understand someone could come into the pac12 or big10 and it could change who wins those conferences. If we got matched up then thats tough, but at least let it be up to chance. Can we discuss or vote on it?

Well my opinion is I'm trying to make the CPU harder so people might actually lose vs the CPU, but if everyone is for it then I'd be cool with it, I'm just trying to think of ways to fix the user undefeatedness

It's tough to fix the user undefeateds. Some people are just good enough to beat all CPU games. Just comes down to playing two user games a year and winning those. I ain't against making the rosé bowl where it isn't tied in to those conferences since Purdue and Oregon are only users in those conferences unless you add a user to each conference.

I like having no bcs tie ins. So the top schools from any conference are in. Bcs game.